1. Introduction
1.1. Problems with the computer. Dr.John Bown worked as a faculty in
a prestigious university in
1.2. A better computer. Dr.John Bown felt
desperate as a result of the technical problems with the laptop. He decided to purchase
the most expensive computer model of SONY VAIO, made in
1.3. Seeking a reasonable technical
service. For a workshop, he luckily
had to go
1.4. Unreasonable
solution for repaired shop. Then, his computer was delivered through Canada Post
two weeks later. He was sure with the result of the computer
repairs because he had taken it to the service
and explained the entire story based upon the
face to face communication. First, he looked at the receipt showing the
cost of their conduct ($180) that was the cost of
the battery change and their testing of computer
hardware, implied that nothing technically wrong.
Additionally, a four month warranty for the computer
repair was offered in the receipt. It seems
that they assured with a detailed receipt that
the computer was fully recovered. He opened the computer and expected it would
be ready to properly work. John had to wait several
hours and realized in the end that the same problem still existed with his
computer. This is a matter discussed below.
1.5. Solution based on a reasonable service.
Finally, John went to ask IT services of the
2. Negligence Analysis:
2.1. A
duty of care: Let’s take a look what
a duty of care means that is owed to foreseeable plaintiff in order to
prevent others from unreasonable risk of the economic loss. As a professional technical service of the Sony,
they have a duty to act as a reasonably prudent consultant in the same similar
circumstances. In this case, John Bown
will elaborate whether he can be qualified to be a foreseeable plaintiff. Since the mainly representative service of the
Sony VAIO is responsible to keep up the professional duty of care in
2.2. Breach
of that duty: Let’s overview the meaning of what the Breach is
that occurs when the defendant’s conduct/service falls
below the standard of care. In this case, John Bown will propose his arguments
in order to show that the Sony Services breached their duty standard of care
because they were granted as the only official service,
Since the problem is still over John Bown’s computer, it clearly shows that a
breach of their duty is presently available under the Foreseeability Test (FT)
that is related to find an answer for a question whether the problem would have
been solved by a reasonable person. The answer for raised question under the FT
is obviously positive since the technical staff of
2.3.
Causation: The fact that
defendant did not live up his responsibility, negligence, caused the Plaintiff
to be suffered with the same problems.
The promise of technical service appeared to be ironic because they
breached the standard of their care.
Therefore, they failed to conduct their regular works and promises for their
job. The reason for the damage is associated to a negligence of the
defendant under the availability of foreseeable test. Instead, they just replaced the battery
simply, that is just needed to use computer without plugging in, and did not
touch the real problem itself. Even they
demanded an advance, $ 50, for a diagnostic test but in the end, they were
failed to solve reported problem itself. The plaintiff was disappointed with
their failure in repairing problems and this caused him to be severely
depressed.
2.4. Damage:
The damage caused here is both physical and mental. There is a significant loss of time and
physical cost, due to fact that the John Bown could not perform his conduct on
his work due to the sustainable existence of the problem with his
computer. Additionally, another loss of
John Bown’s feeling is immeasurable because he was insulted to face up with
Sony’s negligence.
3. Conclusion
The authorized technical services of
any company are supposed to live up a good quality of services to meet the
standard of the customer’s satisfaction or keeping a standard of their
care. As a result, the cased story
discusses so far, both the negligence of the Sony service and Sony
No comments:
Post a Comment